Today, guiding the processes of efficiency’s increase in the crisismanagement committee’s performance is one of the maingovernment’s long‐ term goals. Due to this, the main challenges ofthe political policies and strategic capabilities of the rulinggovernments in developed and developing countries are closelyrelated to the procedures and theories of crisis management. Bylooking more deeply at the collation of the crisis managementprocedures of the different countries in comparison to the past andthe present, clearly we find out significant differences in themanagement process of the developed countries. The base of thenew crisis management’s strategic pyramid in developed countries isbased on integrated, powerful and multi‐dimensional analyticalcommittees. These committees with coherent, continuous anddependent structure are directed and managed by scientific –technical, political‐economic, social subcategories therapeutic.Theories and modern management methods, even with high levels ofinternational relations, are based on the same principles. In the firststep, the main purpose of these committees is to evaluate andanalyze the theories, technologies and modern equipment in noncriticalconditions. In the second step, they are expected to forecastvarious events in the long term, and assess the probability of thefuture crises, that may be contributing to or originating from thecurrent crisis. In the third step, using cutting‐edge technology, to theextent possible and according to need, they manage the criticalevents. In other words, they use practical solutions, diverse andinnovative strategic management theories of “crisis in crisis” and“crisis from crisis”. In the last step, in order to prepare infrastructuresof the modern management crisis, they attempt to acquaint the nonspecialistwith new technologies and new scientific, technical,therapeutic, and medical methods through the mass media. Afterthe last step of the modern management, management processcontinues like the current crisis management in developing countries.Since the correct and practical guidance of the various events willonly achieve by strengthening the scientific base, it is necessary topredict the effects and risks of the current critical events and also tomanage the results in the coming decades. For this reason, thereshould be a plan to expand the concept of “Modern CrisisManagement” in developing countries with the aim of advancingknowledge toward understanding, recognition, and optimizingmodern technologies use. By comparing the views of transmanagement’scrisis, we consider major shortcomings and challengesof the incident management in developing countries as “ModernCrisis Management”. These concepts are formed according to themodels of potential disasters prediction resulting from the pastcrises. So, disasters and inconsistencies are analyzed by predictingand assessing the cause of the current crises and its effect on thecrisis which may occur in the future. In this method, Algorithm ofnatural, non‐natural, climatic and even Organizational EnvironmentalDisaster Management Infrastructures is the same.