The Jordanian recent activity demanding for reform started with youthpowers, away from traditional political parties. It was limited to remote areasand small cities, taking an obvious youth and tribal form along with someparticipation from opposition parties and professional associations. It movedafter a long time to large cities on a small scale. There were a number of gains which do not satisfy political andprofessional powers due to external and internal obstacles. The externalobstacles were mainly seen in a regional alliance aimed at thwarting anydemocratic project, with each country having its own reasons and targets.The internal obstacles were basically represented in the regime’s promotionof two exclusive options: the status quo, or freedom and reform but withoutsecurity as was the case in neighbouring countries. Another internal problem was the inability of political powers to putforward a specific roadmap for reform which would indicate a state ofagreement among all Jordanian political, youth and professional groups.Other obstacles may be the composition of the society as well as thedisagreement over both citizenship and the identity of the state. In 2014, the political, economic situation is unlikely to differ from thatof the previous 3 years of the Arab Spring for several reasons. One of themis the continuous deterioration of the individuals’ and State’s economicconditions. The way this issue is dealt with in the regional and internationalcontexts is not effective. Another reason is the persistence of the non-truststate between the political components of the society and the various stateinstitutions. In conclusion, a way has to be found out of the dilemma of the dead-endin the Jordanian political horizon, in addition to the worsening regionalcrises and their potential impacts on the kingdom. The past disputes need tobe forgotten in order to prioritize the country’s interests and stability.Common goals have to be agreed upon to put an end the state of polarizationand non-trust.